Peter Diamond and Emmanuel Saez, in a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, argue for high tax rates as a means to reduce the deficit, as well as showing higher tax rates have no real correlation to slowing growth in our global economy.
"According to our analysis of current tax rates and their elasticity, the
revenue-maximizing top federal marginal income tax rate would be in or near the
range of 50%-70% (taking into account that individuals face additional taxes
from Medicare and state and local taxes). Thus we conclude that raising the top
tax rate is very likely to result in revenue increases at least until we reach
the 50% rate that held during the first Reagan administration, and possibly
until the 70% rate of the 1970s."
Also:
"But will raising top tax rates significantly lower economic growth? In the
postwar U.S., higher top tax rates tend to go with higher economic growth—not
lower. Indeed, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic
Analysis, GDP annual growth per capita (to adjust for population growth)
averaged 1.68% between 1980 and 2010 when top tax rates were relatively low,
while growth averaged 2.23% between 1950 and 1980 when top tax rates were at or
above 70%."
Read the entire article here.
No comments:
Post a Comment